Network optimization
While many fields are buzzing with discussions about the possibilities of AI and other technological innovations, the realm of network design in supply chains remains conspicuously silent. The major breakthroughs and innovations celebrated in other domains seem absent here. Yet, the potential for transformation in supply chain network design is immense, though the changes required are subtler and more complex than we’re used to. So where are the big new developments? And I’m not talking about AI by the way. Big fan, but that is not where I think we should focus on.
Let me take a step back first. In 1736, Leonard Euler laid the groundwork for graph theory and network topology to solve the famous Königsberg Bridge problem, proving that the structure of connections could be analysed mathematically. Centuries later, this foundation continues to revolutionize fields ranging from artificial intelligence—earning a Nobel Prize in physics just this year—to the internet’s very existence.
Yet in the field of supply chain management, network topology remains a glaring blind spot. Despite its critical role in shaping speed, reliability, costs, flexibility, and resilience, we often reduce networks to a mere cost or logistics optimization exercise. In my latest column, I wrote about this oversight, emphasizing that we need to do better. As someone deeply invested in advancing this field, I see it as a personal obligation to educate and inspire others to embrace the power of network structure.
1. The Information Theory Perspective
Claude Shannon’s Information Theory (1948) explains that the more structured and relevant information we provide, the less uncertainty there is in an output. AI systems—especially Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT—operate on this principle: when an AI model is given vague or insufficient input, it must “guess” more based on probabilistic inference, leading to lower accuracy or more generic, hallucinated, or misaligned responses. When we provide an AI with well-structured, high-quality context, it can reduce uncertainty and generate more precise, relevant, and insightful outputs. In practical terms, this is why prompt engineering and context injection are essential when interacting with AI models: they reduce ambiguity and allow the model to focus on relevant information.
The Lessons of Network Topology: From Euler to Baran
The story of Paul Baran at RAND Corporation illustrates the profound implications of network topology. Tasked with designing a communication system resilient to nuclear attacks, Baran analysed three network structures: centralized, decentralized, and distributed. His recommendation for a distributed structure became the blueprint for the internet—an interconnected web of nodes capable of rerouting data even when parts of the system are disrupted.
Imagine if supply chains adopted a similar mindset, prioritizing flexibility and redundancy over sheer efficiency. Concepts like Network Redundancy Ratio, Path Redundancy Index, and Closeness Centrality could redefine how we evaluate supply chain performance, expanding our focus beyond short-term cost savings to long-term strategic resilience.
Network Topology as a Strategic Asset
To build true resilience, companies must start treating network topology – the structural design of their supply chains – as a strategic element. Traditional metrics like cost and lead time need to be augmented with network resilience indicators such as the Network Redundancy Ratio, Closeness Centrality, and Path Redundancy Index [2]. These metrics reveal the robustness, scalability, and flexibility of a network, which are critical for navigating disruptions.
The analogy to neural networks in AI is instructive here. Just as robust neural network topologies have unlocked breakthroughs in AI, strategically designed supply chain networks can empower organizations to not just survive but thrive in a world of constant uncertainty.
From Blind Spot to Breakthrough
We are living in a time of unprecedented technological advancement. AI and big data are revolutionizing how we approach supply chains, but their potential will remain underutilized if we fail to consider the underlying network structure. A strategically designed network can be a game-changer, enabling companies to adapt, recover, and innovate in the face of disruption.
The lesson from Euler, Baran, and the internet’s distributed architecture is clear: the structure of a network matters. It is not a secondary consideration but a strategic choice. As supply chain leaders, we must embrace this perspective, leveraging network topology as both a science and an art.
In a world where disruption is the norm, the organizations that view their supply chains through the lens of network topology will not just survive—they will thrive. Now is the time to rethink, redesign, and rebuild. Euler showed us the way; it’s up to us to take the next step.
[1] BCI. (2024). Latest BCI report reveals escalating supply chain disruptions drive increased tier mapping and insurance uptake*. Retrieved from https://www.thebci.org/news/supply-chain-disruptions-drive-increased-tier-mapping-and-insurance-uptake.html
SCMR. (2024). The 10 Top Disruptions in 2024 (So Far). Retrieved from https://www.scmr.com/article/the-10-top-disruptions-in-2024
Intuendi. (n.d.). Supply Chain Disruption: Causes, Effects, and Management. Retrieved from https://intuendi.com/resource-center/supply-chain-disruption/
Resilinc. (2024). Life Sciences and Healthcare Supply Chain Recap Q1 2024. Retrieved from https://www.resilinc.com/blog/life-sciences-q1-2024-supply-chain-recap/
[2] Network Redundancy Ratio: Measures the availability of alternative paths, ensuring continuity during disruptions.
Closeness Centrality: Assesses how efficiently goods flow through the network, minimizing delays and bottlenecks.
Flow Entropy: Quantifies the diversity and robustness of supply routes, balancing risk and efficiency.
Path Redundancy Index: Captures the ability to reroute goods, enhancing reliability and resilience.
In-company RAG
Start building you In-company RAG system and learn how to train your model. Learn the basic setup and common pitfalls when it comes to in-company AI.
Create a safe environment | the sandbox
We’ve seen firsthand that creating an environment where small, scrappy teams can innovate without being slowed down by endless reviews is key to unlocking AI’s potential.
How to deploy In-Company AI
Building a Company-Specific Vertical AI: A Practical Guide for C-Level and Supply Chain Leaders. Why Companies Are Exploring Vertical AI.
What we Learned building our Vertical
Going from an abstract vision of “AI that works for supply chain” to a functional, compliant, production-ready AI stack is harder than it sounds
When numbers start talking
Our founder Bas Groothedde meets our In-Company AI Agent AVA. Great stuff.
Giving your AI context in the supply chain
Context-prompting, an important tool to give an llm context. There is strong theoretical and empirical evidence that providing AI with better context improves its performance.
The Evolution of AI Agents
The landscape of AI agents has advanced from basic chatbots to sophisticated entities managing complex tasks across industries.
This is World interview featuring Professor Yann LeCun
LeCun brings clarity to the current discourse on AI with a number of thoughtful, remarks and putting it into perpective. A must-watch for anyone navigating the future of artificial intelligence.
AI is moving so fast, which is why your strategy should be long-term.
Danny Hillis, a pioneer in AI He understood something decades ago that many executives are only now coming to terms with. Technology does not evolve in stable, predictable increments.
The future of AI is not just language models. It’s causal reasoning.
Judea Pearl, is another true pioneering in artificial intelligence. But he is a little bit different. And not on the bandwagon if LLMs. Teach machines to understand the question why.
Intelligence is not what we think it is
In our series about AI, we came across the work of Professor Herbert “Herb” A. Simon, one of the founding figures in artificial intelligence.
Why the human factor remains essential in the Digital Era
No matter how advanced technology becomes, human insight remains essential in managing real-world complexity.
